Suggate-Lenhard-2022

Authors: Sebastian Suggate, Wolfgang Lenhard.

Article: Mental imagery skill predicts adults’ reading performance.

Publication: Learning and Instruction (Elsevier). Volume 80,101633 2022 | DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101633

Highlights

Mental imagery uniquely predicted reading comprehension performance across three experiments.
Links between reading and mental imagery were not explained by processing speed.
A novel and objective measure of mental imagery proved superior to self-report measures.
Mental imagery also appeared to relate to reading fluency

Abstract

Mental imagery is foundational to human experience, lying at the heart of cognition and reading, however research has failed to conclusively investigate and demonstrate a link. Therefore, we conducted three studies measuring adults’ reading and imagery performance. In Study 1, the mental imagery skills of 155 adults were measured using two established self-report measures, namely the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q) and the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS), and a novel imagery comparison task. In Study 2 (n = 452), a control for speeded processing replaced the SUIS. In Study 3 (n = 236), we added a measure of reading speed. Findings indicate that the objective measurement of mental imagery was associated with reading performance, whereas self-report measures were not. Further, reading comprehension linked more strongly to mental imagery than reading speed did. Findings demonstrate, for the first time, that mental imagery processes are intrinsically linked with reading performance.

Tagged as: mental imagery, reading comprehension, reading fluency, reading speed, and visualization

Citation:

Sebastian Suggate, Wolfgang Lenhard,
Mental imagery skill predicts adults’ reading performance,
Learning and Instruction, Volume 80, 2022, 101633

Excerpts from Full Text / Notes:

Imagery comparisons task (ICT)

Specifically, participants were asked to imagine two specific objects, and then requested to make a judgment as to which from the target and distractor item was better encapsulated by a sensory feature (i.e., “which is shinier, [a] trumpet or [a] violin?”). Thus, the question “which is” was played at the beginning of the trial (0 s), followed by the adjective (1 s), then the first target imagery item (2 s), “or” (4 s), and then the second target imagery item (5 s).

Leave a public question or comment:

If you need personal help or assistance please use our contact forms instead.


All comments are moderated. Comments that are not relevant to the page topic or which contain identifiable personal information will not be published.


Your email address will not be published.